Don't bank on Nova Scotia to protect New England's beaches

And don't bank on Nova Scotia to protect Gulf of Maine or Cape Cod Bay either

Projection for size. Gyre currents and wind directions make trajectory assumptions difficult, but it is very likely that an oil spill like the one this month on the Gulf coast would arrive on the shores of Plymouth and Cape Cod as well as Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard. Source.

By Dennis Morrow, NoRigs3 Coalition.

While I have found the recent coverage in New England media about oil and gas development on Georges Bank generally fair and balanced, I feel compelled to respond to a disturbing comments made by senior Nova Scotia Department of Energy officials and repeated in a May 4 Gloucester Times article by Richard Gaines .

If history is a guide Sen. Kerry will consider the apparent disregard of U.S. fishing and environmental interests by the Nova Scotia government seriously misguided.

The official's statement that the government will make its drilling decisions independent of any science panel which might be convened is the equivalent of a bureaucrat and a politician at the state level expressing a position on an issue between Canada and the USA.

Because we manage important groundfish stocks on Georges with the United States and because there is a unique, strong circular current on Georges certain to rapidly spread any oil spill into Canadian and U.S. waters and coastlines, any decision on oil and gas exploration by either country will affect the other country.

This is not a wholly state or provincial issue, but in Canada the federal government seems to be silent and willing to let the province make a decision that has clear international consequences.

If history is any guide, U.S. Sens. Kerry, Brown, Snowe and Collins - and their constituents - will consider the apparent disregard of U.S. fishing and environmental interests by the Nova Scotia government seriously misguided.

In the face of the recent revelations that British Petroleum had successfully lobbied U.S. regulators to lessen the burden on it for certain safety mechanisms, Prime Minister Harper and others are chanting the mantra that "we in Canada can do the regulatory regime more effectively than in the USA."

The oil and gas industry in the Nova Scotia offshore largely comes under the regulatory jurisdiction of the provincial government.

Nova Scotia has a sad history of regulatory control of the coal mining industry that culminated in the terrible Westray mine disaster in the late '90s.

We should all be very worried and extremely vigilant.

There was an inquiry that concluded much of what is being revealed about the BP disaster; that regulations were inadequate and overly influenced by company economic needs, and that the key bureaucrats concerned with enforcement did not do their jobs.

New England should take no comfort in the promises of strict regulations from the Nova Scotia government.

Until the Louisiana and Gulf Coast disaster, the oil and gas industry and Nova Scotia Department of Energy bureaucrats always held the industry's record in the Gulf of Mexico as an example of how low the risk would be to Georges Bank - and how USA regulations and industry technology could take the risk out of these activities.

We should all be very worried and extremely vigilant.

Denny Morrow
NoRigs3 Coalition, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia.
Note: This article first appeared in the Gloucester Times opinion page and is reprinted here with permission of the author and Nova Scotia TODAY. welcomes thoughtful comments and the varied opinions of our readers. We are in no way obligated to post or allow comments that our moderators deem inappropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments we perceive as profane, vulgar, threatening, offensive, racially-biased, homophobic, slanderous, hateful or just plain rude. Commenters may not attack or insult other commenters, readers or writers. Commenters who persist in posting inappropriate comments will be banned from commenting on