NIMBY environmentalists say Washington Times

Yesterday's edition of the Washington Post and today's edition of the Washington Times carried these lead editorials which kindly gave credit to our online newspaper for alerting them. - The Editor 
The Washington PostBending With the Wind

FOR YEARS NOW a story line in Massachusetts has featured the Kennedy family, enthusiastic environmentalists all, loudly opposing one of the most environmentally progressive schemes in the state's history: a large, offshore wind farm known as Cape Wind, to be placed in Nantucket Sound, the only viable site for such a farm off the New England coast. Although the farm would cleanly and quietly produce three-quarters of the total electrical demand for Cape Cod and nearby islands -- a region that could otherwise soon be facing serious power shortages -- and although it has passed through multiple regulatory hoops, both Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his uncle, Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), have denounced the project, in part on the grounds that it would spoil the views "from 16 historic sites and lighthouses on the cape and nearby islands" and presumably from their own summer house as well... Read the rest of  The Washington Post editorial here.

In a highly unusual concordance, The Conservative Republican Washington Times today agreed in their Editorial below with yesterday's Washinton Post Editorial condemning Congressman Don Young's attempt to stop the Cape Wind project - The Editor  

NIMBY environmentalists 

In the interconnected world of energy and environmental policy, where difficult tradeoffs have always been the rule of the day, a win-win solution like the Cape Wind offshore windmill project doesn't come around very often. Embracing cutting-edge technology, Cape Wind epitomizes the long-term need to exploit renewable energy sources to alleviate America's dependence on fossil fuels. And it could do so in real time... Read the rest of The  Washington Times welcomes thoughtful comments and the varied opinions of our readers. We are in no way obligated to post or allow comments that our moderators deem inappropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments we perceive as profane, vulgar, threatening, offensive, racially-biased, homophobic, slanderous, hateful or just plain rude. Commenters may not attack or insult other commenters, readers or writers. Commenters who persist in posting inappropriate comments will be banned from commenting on