APCC Stands Against Weakening of Endangered Species Act

Legislation has protected at-risk species, habitats for 45 years...

The Association to Preserve Cape Cod yesterday submitted a letter to the Trump administration protesting proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act that would weaken the landmark federal conservation legislation that has protected at-risk species and habitats for 45 years. 

The letter, which was addressed to U.S. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, expressed opposition to proposed changes in the policies that the federal government follows to enforce the Endangered Species Act. These policies are administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is an agency of the Department of the Interior, and the National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the Department of Commerce.

These policy changes would:

  • Require that decisions on whether to list a species as threatened or endangered be weighed against potential economic impacts if the species is listed. Currently, such decisions are based on the latest available science. APCC is concerned that private commercial interests, particularly mining and drilling companies, will influence future decisions on the survival of species.
  • Remove protections for new species listed as threatened, which are currently given the same protections as species designated as endangered. Under this proposed change, the killing of threatened species and destruction of their habitats could be allowable by hunting or from commercial, industrial and development impacts.
  • Eliminate the consideration of climate change threats when making decisions about protecting species and habitats.
  • Weaken the longstanding requirement that federal agencies coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to make sure federal projects do not impact threatened or endangered species.

“These proposed changes are a direct attack on one of our country’s most cherished conservation acts,” said Andrew Gottlieb, APCC’s executive director. “This is a further abandonment of the environment by the Trump administration, and is a blatant move to put private commercial interests ahead of protecting our nation’s natural heritage.”

Established in 1968, APCC is the Cape Cod’s region-wide nonprofit environmental advocacy and education organization.

The text of APCC’s letter follows.


September 10, 2018


Secretary Ryan Zinke

U.S. Department of the Interior

c/o U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service


5275 Leesburg Pike

Falls Church, VA 22041-3803


Secretary Wilbur Ross

U.S. Department of Commerce

c/o National Marine Fisheries Service

Office of Protected Resources

1315 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910


RE:      Revision of the Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat (FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0006)

Revision of the Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants (FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0007)

Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation (FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0009) 


Dear Secretary Zinke and Secretary Ross:


The Association to Preserve Cape Cod (APCC) writes in strong and resolute opposition to proposed changes to the Endangered Species Act, which if adopted would strip away long-established regulations that have protected thousands of threatened and endangered species from extinction.


Established in 1968, APCC is the Cape Cod, Massachusetts region’s leading nonprofit environmental advocacy and education organization, working for the adoption of laws, policies and programs that protect and enhance Cape Cod’s natural resources and quality of life.


One of the pillars of APCC’s mission is helping to ensure protection of fragile habitats that support rare and endangered species on Cape Cod. For most of APCC’s 50-year existence, we have regarded the federal government as a trusted partner in efforts to protect at-risk species on the Cape and in the oceans that surround it, thanks to the enactment of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 and the promulgation and enforcement of effective regulations that support the purposes of the act.


The Endangered Species Act is one of America’s most successful and popular environmental policies, and it has served as a model for conservation to the rest of the world. National polls consistently show that 80 percent of Americans support the Endangered Species Act. The provisions of the act and its current regulations have repeatedly proven to be enormously successful in bringing back species from the brink of extinction.


APCC therefore opposes the proposed change that would remove the phrase “without reference to possible economic or other impacts of such determination” when deciding whether to list a species. Central to the Endangered Species Act’s success—and to the recognition and respect it has earned—has been its reliance solely on the best available science in determining which species to list and in adopting polices for protecting species and habitats. This proposed change will pit economic interests against science when determinations are being made about listing a species or protecting critical habitat. It will inevitably insert a bias towards special interests and private industry in determining the future survival of a species. It would, without any uncertainty, imperil species and their habitats and put the most vulnerable species on a path toward extinction. This proposed change strikes at the very purpose and intent of the Endangered Species Act, and undermines the long-recognized value of sound science in providing the proper analysis for such determinations.


APCC opposes the proposed change to weaken the long-standing requirement that federal agencies coordinate with the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service to make sure projects do not adversely impact endangered species. This change, which would essentially give federal agencies carte blanche to proceed with projects without any regard for the destruction of habitat or killing of endangered species, is an abandonment by the federal government of its responsibility as caretaker of the natural heritage that all U.S. citizens collectively own. One example of a potential casualty of this proposed change is the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale. While the proposal claims that species currently classified as endangered would continue to receive their same protections, we are concerned that allowing lower standards for assessment and enforcement of habitats could easily doom this most vulnerable of species.


APCC opposes proposed changes that prohibit consideration of future and likely threats to species in determining their protective status. We view this revision as a conscious move to specifically block the ability to consider climate change impacts, making it more difficult to protect numerous species whose habitats are predicted to be drastically and adversely affected by climate change.


APCC opposes proposed changes that strip protections provided to species designated as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act. Until this point, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has extended similar protections to threatened species as it does to endangered species, recognizing that in determining that an at-risk species has reached threatened status, protections are warranted in order to stabilize a species’ population and to help it recover before it becomes endangered. The proposed change would be an egregious retreat from accepted standards for protecting species at risk. Under this proposed rollback, it would be permissible to kill threatened species and to allow their habitats to be destroyed to the point where it could become impossible to save them from extinction once they fall into endangered status.


In 1973, the Endangered Species Act passed the House of Representatives by a 355-4 vote, was unanimously approved by the Senate, and signed into law by a Republican president who declared, “Nothing is more priceless and more worthy of preservation than the rich array of animal life with which our country has been blessed.”


If adopted, the proposed changes, which are a calculated attempt to undercut the effectiveness of the Endangered Species Act, would betray the spirit in which it was enacted and unravel the trust placed in the federal government by the American people to be responsible stewards of our nation’s natural heritage.


We call on the Trump administration to withdraw these proposed changes.




Andrew Gottlieb

Executive Director


cc:        Senator Edward Markey

            Senator Elizabeth Warren

            Representative William Keating

CapeCodToday.com welcomes thoughtful comments and the varied opinions of our readers. We are in no way obligated to post or allow comments that our moderators deem inappropriate. We reserve the right to delete comments we perceive as profane, vulgar, threatening, offensive, racially-biased, homophobic, slanderous, hateful or just plain rude. Commenters may not attack or insult other commenters, readers or writers. Commenters who persist in posting inappropriate comments will be banned from commenting on CapeCodToday.com.